Something really interesting is happening to Twitter. What some people may see as an ocean of facile, pointless babble, is in fact evolving into powerful tool for discovering real-time insight into public opinion, which can be used to predict things such as the success of upcoming movie releases, stock market movements and even election results.

The technology is still in its infancy, but the promise is very alluring and there are a number of good reasons that Twitter lends itself well to this kind of experiment.

Brevity
Tweets are short enough to be analysed by a computer with relative accuracy and speed. In a 500 article there’s plenty of room for ambiguity and flowery language, making it hard for any algorithm to extract meaning. But the 140 character limit forces people to keep their tweets short and to the point, making the analysis much easier.

Immediacy
People share their thoughts on Twitter quickly and without the same level of mental filtering that would go into a blog post. You use Twitter to say what’s on your mind right now, but for a blog post you spend some time mulling the topic over and refining your thoughts before you share them. Therefore, I would argue, Twitter not only provides a more instant picture of the world’s opinions, but also a more honest one.

Volume
Even if just 5% of Twitter’s 175 million+ registered users are active, that’s still a pretty substantial sample size to collect data from.

What this means is that with the right kind of algorithm, you can mine Twitter for sentiment/opinions on any given topic, such as the title of a new movie, and paint a fairly accurate picture of how the world feels about it (or even just learn that nobody’s talking about it at all). Fflick.com is already doing this to provide movie ratings based on the overall sentiment of Twitter conversations.

And, as with the stock market experiment, you can do interesting things like compare the general sentiment of Twitter users against things like index movements and identify correlations between the two. If you know that when Twitter users in London feel happy on Monday there’s an 80% chance that the market will rise on Wednesday, that’s clearly a very powerful insight.

Schrodinger’s tweet

But where is this taking us? Obviously if Twitter proved to be an accurate instrument for predicting stock market movements, that would soon enough change the way people trade stocks and it would only be a matter of time before the prediction no longer worked. If people know the market is going to fall tomorrow, why would they buy today? The very act of making the prediction changes the outcome.

And there’s the problem of confusing cause with correlation. Is nobody tweeting about the new George Clooney film because nobody wants to see it, or is nobody going to see the film because not enough people are talking about it?

It’s inevitable that as this technology develops we’re going to see new services making all sorts of promises about what kinds of things they can predict and how accurately they can predict them. The only prediction I’m prepared to make is that once this happens, as with everything else involved in social media, the market will consist of about 10% genuine innovation and 90% snake-oil. The hard part for marketers will be telling the difference between them.

Please excuse any strange goings-on around here over the next day or so. I’m currently upgrading to the latest version of WordPress for this blog, which also required me to upgrade MySQL and PHP to more recent releases, and this resulted in a few technical hitches.

Fortunately I’ve recovered all of the posts and comments, but putting it all back together again is going to take a day or two. I hope WordPress 3 turns out to be worth it…

I’ve been quoted in Reputation Online today for a story about search and PR and, just in case anybody’s interested, here are my slightly expanded thoughts on the subject:

PR and search are closely linked, and a lot of PR people are already doing SEO even if they don’t realise it.

SEO has two main elements; On-page and off-page. On page SEO consists of all the technical stuff (like making sure your site is set up properly to be efficiently indexed by the search engines) and having plenty of good content that is relevant to your business.

On-page SEO is largely going to be handled by the digital team or an in-house SEO specialist, but PR can contribute by doing things like running a corporate blog which will be a source of good quality, relevant content.

Where PR can really make a difference is with the off-page SEO. Off-page SEO essentially means getting plenty of links to your site from others, and wherever possible these links need to come from respectable, well established sites. The higher profile the site, the more valuable the link. For example, a link from a page on bbc.co.uk can be incredibly powerful in SEO terms and the long term value of that link could probably outweigh the initial PR value of the coverage in a lot of cases.

How to get those links? Create compelling stories, drive conversations, do things that are interesting so that people want to talk about your company and will link back to your website when they do so. These are traditional PR skills, and it’s a happy coincidence that SEO people usually struggle with this side of things; I don’t think many SEO experts will argue that creating and pitching stories to journalists and bloggers is something they should be doing.

Let the SEO guys take care of the technical and on-page aspects of the work, and let the PR people do the part which involves persuading people to write about your business. So, even though a lot of PR people might not think they understand SEO, if they’ve ever pitched a story that has resulted in online coverage with a link back to the client’s site, they’ve already made a great start.

There are technical issues to consider such as keyword selection, anchor text, deep-linking and so on which require a little know-how, and for this reason I think PR and SEO teams need to work together to be most effective. I always try to make friends with clients’ SEO people because, even though I understand the technicalities, I still need to understand what strategy they’re using and what keywords they’re focusing on so that I can align our efforts with theirs.

So, to summarise, I think PR can contribute to SEO in a number of ways which complement the skills of SEO experts:

  • Creating compelling content on the client’s website/blog which will encourage people to link to it
  • Generating coverage in mainstream and social media which will often come with high-value links to the client’s site

It’s not just about getting top spot in the search results

Obviously getting the client to the top of Google’s search results for their relevant keywords is a good thing to do, but what about the rest of the page? Ideally, if a consumer is researching a brand or product, you want all of the search results below the client’s website to consist of positive third party recommendation: glowing press coverage, product reviews on blogs, consumer recommendations in discussion forums, information about CSR activity, etc.

Most SEO activity focuses only on getting that top-spot for the relevant keywords, but all of this other stuff is vitally important too. It’s here that digital-savvy PR people can really add value, both in terms of driving those positive discussions in the first place, and in helping to make sure they are visible to consumers.